Bug 8981 follow-up: case

While QAing your patch, I saw you were writting "MarcFlavour", it should have been "marcflavour"

Will work with the UC, but let's be consistent.

This patch fixes another MarcFlavour just a few lines before I spotted by chance

Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>

diff --git a/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl b/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl
index 86ecb23..3e17cf1 100755 (executable)
--- a/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl
+++ b/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ if ($show_marc) {
         my @subfields_data;
 
 # skip UNIMARC fields <200, they are useless for a patron
-        next if C4::Context->preference('MarcFlavour') eq 'UNIMARC' && $field->tag() <200;
+        next if C4::Context->preference('marcflavour') eq 'UNIMARC' && $field->tag() <200;
 
 # if tag <10, there's no subfield, use the "@" trick
         if ( $field->tag() < 10 ) {
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ if ($show_marc) {
             $subfield_data{marc_tag}      = $field->tag();
             push( @subfields_data, \%subfield_data );
         }
-        elsif ( C4::Context->preference('MarcFlavour') eq 'MARC21' && $field->tag() eq 667 ) {
+        elsif ( C4::Context->preference('marcflavour') eq 'MARC21' && $field->tag() eq 667 ) {
             # tagfield 667 is a nonpublic general note in MARC21, which shouldn't be shown in the OPAC
         }
         else {